Re: [PATCHES] Clarify libpq docs

2004-01-26 Thread Neil Conway
Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The attached patch clarifies (or, rather, makes explicit) to readers how > to handle memory management for char pointers returned by libpq > functions. Patch applied. I expanded the tabs in that file to 4 spaces, per the discussion. I also noticed and fix

Re: [PATCHES] Clarify libpq docs

2004-01-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Please don't put tabs in SGML files. > > That's a new one on me. Why should we avoid tabs? The existing > files are certainly full of them. Those are just the files that I haven't edited recently and gave the old "M-x untabify"

Re: [PATCHES] Clarify libpq docs

2004-01-26 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please don't put tabs in SGML files. That's a new one on me. Why should we avoid tabs? The existing files are certainly full of them. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [PATCHES] Clarify libpq docs

2004-01-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Gavin Sherry wrote: > The attached patch clarifies (or, rather, makes explicit) to readers > how to handle memory management for char pointers returned by libpq > functions. Although the sections on PQfinish(), PQclear() and > PQfreemem() give an indication that all pointers returned by > functions