Re: [PATCHES] Doc for ltrim and rtrim

[Bruce Momjian]

Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
 The doc for the trim functions does not say that the second argument can 
 be omitted. This patch fixes it. It also fixes that the type text was not 
 wrapped as typetext/type.

Good.

 I can not build the docs myself, but i'm pretty sure it's correct.

No problem.  See the developers page for 5-minute build so you can check
your commit.

 Is it okay to commit this? Should I do it on the 7.4 branch also, before
 the release?

Sure.  We don't normally backpatch doc adjustment into subreleases, but
you could classify this as a doc bug.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [PATCHES] Doc for ltrim and rtrim

[Neil Conway]

Bruce Momjian wrote:
No problem.  See the developers page for 5-minute build so you can check
your commit.
I think it's best if people always check that they don't break the 
docs before committing changes. make check should be sufficient, and 
that is much faster than building the docs completely.

-Neil

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
 subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
 message can get through to the mailing list cleanly