Re: [PATCHES] Hibernate Dialects for PostgreSQL

2007-11-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Montag, 12. November 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
 On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:28 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
  Simon Riggs wrote:
   I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers.
 
  There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8.  Please don't do that; it would
  confuse users about the versioning scheme.

 Would 8x be the right thing then?

 So PostgreSQL8xDialect or PostgreSQL80Dialect or ...

If you know it doesn't work before 8.0, PostgreSQL80Dialect sounds right.  
Otherwise just PostgreSQLDialect or perhaps something like PostgreSQL{Base|
Abstract}Dialect.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [PATCHES] Hibernate Dialects for PostgreSQL

2007-11-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Simon Riggs wrote:
 I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers.

There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8.  Please don't do that; it would 
confuse users about the versioning scheme.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [PATCHES] Hibernate Dialects for PostgreSQL

2007-11-12 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:28 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
 Simon Riggs wrote:
  I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers.
 
 There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8.  Please don't do that; it would 
 confuse users about the versioning scheme.

Would 8x be the right thing then?

So PostgreSQL8xDialect or PostgreSQL80Dialect or ...

-- 
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [PATCHES] Hibernate Dialects for PostgreSQL

2007-11-12 Thread David Fetter
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:41:49PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
 On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 14:28 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
  Simon Riggs wrote:
   I enclose 3 Dialects for PostgreSQL, as discussed on -hackers.
  
  There is no such thing as PostgreSQL 8.  Please don't do that; it would 
  confuse users about the versioning scheme.
 
 Would 8x be the right thing then?
 
 So PostgreSQL8xDialect or PostgreSQL80Dialect or ...

I'd say 80 so it's easy to separate off 81, 82, 83, etc. :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter  XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match