On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:33:44PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
+ DCH_I,
^^^
DCH_,
DCH_YYY,
DCH_YY,
There is a bug.. it's wrong position. Please, add the enum of
DCH_I to same position as you have I in next array. It means
enum
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:41:18AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch allows you to use I as format specifier to get the
ISO year, the year correspondeing to the ISO week number (IW).
The purpose of to_char() as I understand it is to be 100% Oracle
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:18:08PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
DCH_IW,
+ DCH_IYYY,
+ DCH_IYY,
+ DCH_IY,
+ DCH_I,
It's better :-) This patch is OK for me.
Karel
--
Karel Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
---(end of
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 07:14:53PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Which patch is OK? The one attached? You looked like you were making
changes to this patch in your later emails.
That is the changed/good patch.
Kurt
---(end of broadcast)---
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:41:18AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch allows you to use I as format specifier to get the
ISO year, the year correspondeing to the ISO week number (IW).
The purpose of to_char() as I understand it is to be 100% Oracle
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I have no idea if this in Oracle or not. But it's something I
needed, and other people in the past asked about it too.
It is in Oracle, but you aren't exactly on the spot. It should be
IYYY - 4 digits ('2003')
IYY - 3 digits ('003')
IY - 2 digits ('03')
I- 1
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:47:41PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I have no idea if this in Oracle or not. But it's something I
needed, and other people in the past asked about it too.
It is in Oracle, but you aren't exactly on the spot. It should be
IYYY - 4 digits
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 06:47:41PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I have no idea if this in Oracle or not. But it's something I
needed, and other people in the past asked about it too.
It is in Oracle, but you aren't exactly on the spot. It should be
IYYY - 4 digits
