Re: [PATCHES] LISTEN/NOTIFY regression tests

2003-11-21 Thread Manfred Koizar
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:31:20 -0500, Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I searched a couple different archives of -hackers, but I didn't find >anything that looked relevant. It's on -patches: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2002-08/msg00583.php Servus Manfred --

Re: [PATCHES] LISTEN/NOTIFY regression tests

2003-11-20 Thread Neil Conway
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We have previously speculated about setting up some sort of test > harness program that can drive multiple backends through a > coordinated series of operations. It would also be useful to test other concurrent properties of the backend: for example, "all int

Re: [PATCHES] LISTEN/NOTIFY regression tests

2003-11-20 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch adds some primitive regression tests for the LISTEN, > NOTIFY, and UNLISTEN commands -- there were previously no regression > tests for this functionality. These cannot usefully be tested with our current regression test methodology, as you obse

Re: [PATCHES] LISTEN/NOTIFY regression tests

2003-11-17 Thread Neil Conway
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are currently two problems/caveats with the patch [...] I just wanted to check that no one had any input or comments on the issues described in the original email -- "Speak now, or forever..." :-) I'm thinking of solving both problems by doing LISTE