Re: [PATCHES] MS-VC build patch

2006-06-26 Thread Hiroshi Saito

Umm, It is strange.. I think that you have another config.h.?
I look at much error by the reason for being realistic.
I will become on tomorrow night, since I am not in the machine 
which can work now.


Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

From: Magnus Hagander



Hi Bruce-san.

It does not help me yet. He uses VC2005.:-( It seems that 
furthermore, it is still in the middle of work.

One problem is visible to the next.(win32.mak)
+   if not exist pg_config_os.h copy port\win32.h pg_config_os.h
If VC6+ is still supported, I will submit the patch again.
What I patch has built both the client and the server by VC6+. 


I don't think there's anything specific in my patch that should kill
VC6. What specifically does not work in VC6?

(Just reverting the whole patch doesn't seem right to me...)

//Magnus

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [PATCHES] MS-VC build patch

2006-06-26 Thread Magnus Hagander
 Hi Bruce-san.
 
 It does not help me yet. He uses VC2005.:-( It seems that 
 furthermore, it is still in the middle of work.
 One problem is visible to the next.(win32.mak)
 +   if not exist pg_config_os.h copy port\win32.h pg_config_os.h
 If VC6+ is still supported, I will submit the patch again.
 What I patch has built both the client and the server by VC6+. 

I don't think there's anything specific in my patch that should kill
VC6. What specifically does not work in VC6?

(Just reverting the whole patch doesn't seem right to me...)

//Magnus

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [PATCHES] MS-VC build patch

2006-06-22 Thread Magnus Hagander
 Hi Bruce-san, and Magnus-san,
 
 I have many problems by client construction of 8.2.
 This patch helps a MS-VC client and server construction.
 However, IPV6 still has the problem.
 Please fully take into consideration.

Hi!

Hiroshi - why are you taking out all the stuff from pg_config.h.win32?
It's necessary to build the complete system on win32.

It's possible (I'd say now likely) that something in the client-only vc
build broke with the patch to allow full system build with vc. IIRC I
tested it before I sent it in, but some changes were made after
application - and it's possible I forgot to include something in the
patch.

As for the other parts - I haven't seen those problems, but I'm not
working off latest-and-greatest CVS. I need to merge up to that soon,
I'll take a look at it then.

//Magnus

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly