Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-06 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:38:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: I checked the Majordomo logs and there's nothing about those patches. I do see one message with the Subject: pgsql: Clean up double negative, per Tom Lane. line. A message held

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-06 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:38:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: revision 1.23 date: 2008/03/05 19:42:11; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4 Add support for dlopen on recent NetBSD/MIPS, per Rémi Zara. 19:42:11 I have one email going out to

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Rémi Zara wrote: Hi, Recent version of NetBSD/MIPS support dlopen. This patch makes the netbsd dynloader tests availability of dlopen on HAVE_DLOPEN rather than on __mips__ Applied, thanks. -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rémi Zara wrote: Recent version of NetBSD/MIPS support dlopen. This patch makes the netbsd dynloader tests availability of dlopen on HAVE_DLOPEN rather than on __mips__ Applied, thanks. Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here.

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: R�mi Zara wrote: Recent version of NetBSD/MIPS support dlopen. This patch makes the netbsd dynloader tests availability of dlopen on HAVE_DLOPEN rather than on __mips__ Applied, thanks. Anyway: (1) this should probably be

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here. Yeah, that's strange -- the (2) commit message got to me, but this one hasn't. Moderation filter got it for some reason? None of the back-patch commits came through either,

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Both done -- I backpatched all the way down to 7.4 (and later I noticed that the only 7.3 BF members are NetBSD). Haven't we declared 7.3 at EOL anyway? cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here. Yeah, that's strange -- the (2) commit message got to me, but this one hasn't. Moderation filter got it for some reason? Hmm, not moderation, because

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here. Yeah, that's strange -- the (2) commit message got to me, but this one hasn't. None of the back-patch commits came

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Magnus Hagander
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here. Yeah, that's strange -- the (2) commit message got to me, but this one hasn't. None of the back-patch commits

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Both done -- I backpatched all the way down to 7.4 (and later I noticed that the only 7.3 BF members are NetBSD). Haven't we declared 7.3 at EOL anyway? That's why I didn't backpatch it there. But if

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Andrew Dunstan wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Both done -- I backpatched all the way down to 7.4 (and later I noticed that the only 7.3 BF members are NetBSD). Haven't we declared 7.3 at EOL anyway? That's why I didn't backpatch it there. But if that's the case, why are we still reporting

Re: [PATCHES] NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen

2008-03-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Magnus Hagander wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: I checked the Majordomo logs and there's nothing about those patches. I do see one message with the Subject: pgsql: Clean up double negative, per Tom Lane. line. A message held for moderation shows up in the logs with a stall status. So these