Re: [PATCHES] Patch Status

2008-03-17 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Well, this all seemed like work-in-progress stuff so it wasn't being
> tracked.  If you have things that need to be reviewed/applied, I suggest
> you resubmit and mark them as ready.

OK thanks, will do.

> As far as the doc patch, I see that as applied by Tom:
> 
>   revision 2.113
>   date: 2008/01/23 20:21:37;  author: tgl;  state: Exp;  lines: +10 -4
>   branches:  2.113.2;
>   Provide a concrete example of parameter expansion in archive_command.
>   Per discussion of bug #3877.  Simon Riggs, some fixes by moi.

Yep, see it now. My mistake. 

-- 
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com 

  PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk


-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] Patch Status

2008-03-17 Thread Bruce Momjian

Well, this all seemed like work-in-progress stuff so it wasn't being
tracked.  If you have things that need to be reviewed/applied, I suggest
you resubmit and mark them as ready.

As far as the doc patch, I see that as applied by Tom:

revision 2.113
date: 2008/01/23 20:21:37;  author: tgl;  state: Exp;  lines: +10 -4
branches:  2.113.2;
Provide a concrete example of parameter expansion in archive_command.
Per discussion of bug #3877.  Simon Riggs, some fixes by moi.

---

Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've submitted 5 patches in Jan/Feb, none of which appear on the patch
> status page for the CommitFest, or any other status page I'm aware of.
> There *is* a comment on that page about "Minor Recovery..." which was a
> patch from me that was committed to 8.3 on 26 Sep 2007, so that item can
> be removed from the list.
> 
> My understanding of status on them is this:
> 
> * Bulk Insert tuning - 26 Feb
> Reviewed and changes agreed. With me to complete patch.
> 
> * TransactionIdIsInProgress cache
> Committed on 11 Mar
> 
> * Truncate Triggers - 30 Jan
> Not reviewed yet.
> This is a fully tested and production ready patch, apart from a few
> sections of #ifdef'd code that were intended as stubs to show how we
> might implement a brief suggestion of Tom's as an extension to the
> concept of Truncate Triggers. I think we can ignore that and look to
> apply the patch, minus the #ifdef'd sections now. Happy to produce a
> clean patch with no #ifdef'd sections if that assists review.
> 
> * sinval contention reduction - 25 Jan
> A discussion patch prior to some performance testing which subsequently
> never took place. FWIW I have an updated patch which I haven't yet
> published but haven't yet had access to a test machine to try this at
> high volumes.
> 
> * Doc patch for bug 3877 - 17 Jan
> Ready to be applied.
> 
> My understanding is that all prior patches of mine have been dealt with.
> 
> -- 
>   Simon Riggs
>   2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com 
> 
>   PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches