Robert Treat wrote:
Is there any plans to back patch this into 8.0.x?
Yeah, I was wondering about that -- I've backported the patch to
REL8_0_STABLE.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://arc
On Sunday 01 May 2005 11:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The example given in create domain seems to be broken. ISTM it requires
> > some extra escaping to be usable (at least in my goings on today it sure
> > was, and I the entries in pg_constraint sure seem to i
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The example given in create domain seems to be broken. ISTM it requires some
> extra escaping to be usable (at least in my goings on today it sure was, and
> I the entries in pg_constraint sure seem to indicate this as well). I
> suggest that the examp
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 07:45:29PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > Not sure what your driving at here... my point is that the \
> > escaping is incorrect in the current examples.
>
> That was pretty much my thought. It's extremely easy to turn regexes
> into unmaintainable garbage, whereas the
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:08:32PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2005 21:14, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:12:27PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> > > --- 167,174
> > >
> > > CREATE DOMAIN us_postal_code AS TEXT
> > > CHECK(
> > > !VALUE ~ '^\
On Saturday 30 April 2005 21:14, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:12:27PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> > --- 167,174
> >
> > CREATE DOMAIN us_postal_code AS TEXT
> > CHECK(
> > !VALUE ~ '^\\d{5}$'
> > ! OR VALUE ~ '^\\d{5}-\\d{4}$'
> > );
>
> Huh, why not
>
> VAL
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:12:27PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> --- 167,174
>
> CREATE DOMAIN us_postal_code AS TEXT
> CHECK(
> !VALUE ~ '^\\d{5}$'
> ! OR VALUE ~ '^\\d{5}-\\d{4}$'
> );
Huh, why not
VALUE ~ '^\\d{5}(-\\d{4})?$'
?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
"Cuan
