Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for rules with RETURNING
On 9/1/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ... What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just went really wacko. -- Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300 EnterpriseDB Corporation| fax: 732.331.1301 33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Iselin, New Jersey 08830| http://www.enterprisedb.com/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for rules with RETURNING
Jonah H. Harris wrote: On 9/1/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ... What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just went really wacko. I see the attachment fine. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for rules with RETURNING
Jonah H. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 9/1/06, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a draft patch that makes rules support RETURNING ... What format is that patch in? Either something's wrong or Gmail just went really wacko. It's just a gzip'd patch diff. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
