On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 02:25:24PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:16:32PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I have applied a fairly well reworked version of this. The big thing is
> > that I moved the building of the pgc code out of the regression test driver
> > and into
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:16:32PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I have applied a fairly well reworked version of this. The big thing is
> that I moved the building of the pgc code out of the regression test driver
> and into the build system using msbuild.
>
> I also did a couple of minor fixes
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:55:55PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Joachim Wieland attempted to post this patch, but it appears to be gone.
> > I tried a repost, and notivced it got rejected because it was >100kb.
> > Let me repeat previous objections that it really shoul
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Joachim Wieland attempted to post this patch, but it appears to be gone.
> I tried a repost, and notivced it got rejected because it was >100kb.
> Let me repeat previous objections that it really should be possible to
> post a patch >100kb.
> That said, here's a gzipped ver
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Joachim Wieland attempted to post this patch, but it appears to be gone.
>
> I trust the applied version will contain neither Windows newlines nor
> non-English comments.
Certainly would assume so. I haven't actually looked at the p
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joachim Wieland attempted to post this patch, but it appears to be gone.
I trust the applied version will contain neither Windows newlines nor
non-English comments.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcas
"Joachim Wieland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Zdenek Kotala sent in regression tests for SET a few days ago which got
> turned down. I think however that the idea has merit and that only his
> implementation was not useful. Attached is another regression test script
> that executes some SET / SET
