ITAGAKI Takahiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we can resurrect his idea because we will scan btree pages
at-atime now; the missing-restarting-point problem went away.
Have I missed something? Comments welcome.
I was thinking for awhile just now that this would break the interlock
that
ITAGAKI Takahiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a revised patch originated by Junji TERAMOTO for HEAD.
[BTree vacuum before page splitting]
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00301.php
I think we can resurrect his idea because we will scan btree pages
at-atime now;
ITAGAKI Takahiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a revised patch originated by Junji TERAMOTO for HEAD.
[BTree vacuum before page splitting]
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00301.php
I think we can resurrect his idea because we will scan btree pages
at-atime now;
Tom Lane wrote:
ITAGAKI Takahiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a revised patch originated by Junji TERAMOTO for HEAD.
[BTree vacuum before page splitting]
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00301.php
I think we can resurrect his idea because we will scan btree
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 10:49 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
This is a revised patch originated by Junji TERAMOTO for HEAD.
[BTree vacuum before page splitting]
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00301.php
I think we can resurrect his idea because we will scan btree
