Patch removed from patch queue --- NikhilS, please resubmit when you are
ready. Thanks.
---
NikhilS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per discussion on -hackers, a patch which allows updates to use
> subselects is attached with this mai
Hi Tom,
> ... eg backend/nodes/, optimizer/util/clauses.c, ruleutils.c...)
>
> Actually, on further thought ruleutils.c represents one of the biggest
> stumbling blocks here. We have to be able to reverse-compile the parse
> tree into something that's at least semantically equivalent to the
> ori
I wrote:
> ... eg backend/nodes/, optimizer/util/clauses.c, ruleutils.c...)
Actually, on further thought ruleutils.c represents one of the biggest
stumbling blocks here. We have to be able to reverse-compile the parse
tree into something that's at least semantically equivalent to the
original que
NikhilS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As per discussion on -hackers, a patch which allows updates to use
> subselects is attached with this mail.
I looked over this patch briefly, and I'm afraid it still needs a lot of
work.
The way you altered transformUpdateStmt is a mess; it's duplicating
logi
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
NikhilS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per discussion on -hackers, a patch which allows updates to use
> subselects is attached
