On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 09:39 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> What other auxiliary processes are you envisioning, anyway?
WAL Writer, multiple bgwriters, checkpoint process, parallel query and
sort slavesplus all the ones I haven't dreamed of yet.
No need to agree with my short list, but we do s
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:41 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > The main change is to have an array of Worker structs in shared memory;
> > each worker checks the current table of all other Workers, and skips a
> > table that's being vacuumed by any of them. It also rechecks t
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:41 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The main change is to have an array of Worker structs in shared memory;
> each worker checks the current table of all other Workers, and skips a
> table that's being vacuumed by any of them. It also rechecks the table
> before vacuuming,
