Tom Lane wrote:
It seemed a tad excessive to me, at least for routine regression
testing. What do you think of making it a separate test script and
adding it to make bigcheck, as we did once with the numeric_big tests?
I'm not sure I see the point: I would guess that the rate at which we're
Uh, opinions on this? We don't normally test every feature of a
command, do we?
---
Koju Iijima wrote:
Dear community,
We found that one of RT items namespace has only few test cases.
So I added more test cases to
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uh, opinions on this? We don't normally test every feature of a
command, do we?
It seemed a tad excessive to me, at least for routine regression
testing. What do you think of making it a separate test script and
adding it to make bigcheck, as we did
