Neil Conway wrote:
I'll apply this patch to HEAD later today, barring any objections.
Applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neil Conway wrote:
Right, which is why the patch adds fflushes to the Unix implementation
of internal_forkexec(). On reflection, it is probably more
straightforward to just invoke fork_process() from the Unix version of
internal_forkexec() -- attached is a revised patch that does this.
I'll appl
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm worried about whether this doesn't break the EXEC_BACKEND case.
Most of the code you've moved out isn't applicable to Windows, but
the fflushes probably are
Right, which is why the patch adds fflushes to the Unix implementation
of internal_forkexec(). On reflection, it is proba
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch moves all the common code that is usually invoked before
> doing a fork() into a single function, fork_process(). It is not aware
> of the EXEC_BACKEND machinery, so it should be used as fork() currently
> is -- inside an #ifndef EXEC_BACKEND