On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 02:04, Neil Conway wrote:
> This patch cleans up the licensing terms on some imported BSD-licensed
> files in the source tree
Patch applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the u
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 00:11, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In my opinion, this is a completely pointless exercise in replacing
> perfectly good code with code that we didn't know until today. Not
> during beta please.
Well, I think the chance of there being a bug in NetBSD's strtol/strtoul
(that do
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Neil Conway wrote:
Attached is a patch that replaces src/port/{strtol.c,strtoul.c} with
versions derived from current NetBSD CVS sources, which has a
3-clause BSD license.
In my opinion, this is a completely pointless exercise in replacing
perfectly good
Neil Conway wrote:
> Attached is a patch that replaces src/port/{strtol.c,strtoul.c} with
> versions derived from current NetBSD CVS sources, which has a
> 3-clause BSD license.
In my opinion, this is a completely pointless exercise in replacing
perfectly good code with code that we didn't know u
Tom Lane wrote:
I think it is a real bad idea to unilaterally change the copyright text
in files we got from somewhere else, no matter how benign our intentions.
Agreed.
Instead, how about adopting the NetBSD version of the functionality?
If the files did indeed come from UCB originally, then NetBS
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch cleans up the licensing terms on some imported BSD-licensed
> files in the source tree:
Looks good.
> I was also going to update the licenses on files imported from FreeBSD,
> but apparently they haven't bothered fixing their files to reflect
