Re: [PATCHES] mingw autoconf again
Magnus Hagander wrote: So I was fixing my MingW environment to test and fix that issue with the functions missing. In doing so, I came across the error previously discussed that gettimeofday() is now suddently defined in the latest versions of mingw, but wasn't before. Is it just missing from header files, or does it really not exist? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [PATCHES] mingw autoconf again
Heikki Linnakangas wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: So I was fixing my MingW environment to test and fix that issue with the functions missing. In doing so, I came across the error previously discussed that gettimeofday() is now suddently defined in the latest versions of mingw, but wasn't before. Is it just missing from header files, or does it really not exist? It really does not exist. We have a replacement in port/. //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [PATCHES] mingw autoconf again
Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb Magnus Hagander: 1) does it look ok? yes 2) is it ok to put checks for win32-only this way? Well, the available replacement implementation only works on win32, so this is about as correct as we should care to be at the moment. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
