Re: [PATCHES] pg_restore -F bug

2005-04-30 Thread Neil Conway
Tom Lane wrote: Certainly --- particularly if the error makes it dump core, as seems likely (haven't tried it). Ok, backpatched to stable branches back to 7.2 -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Re: [PATCHES] pg_restore -F bug

2005-04-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: This patch fixes a bug in the error message emitted by pg_restore on an incorrect -F argument: write_msg() expects its first parameter to be a module name, not the format string. Patch applied to HEAD. Is this worth backporting? BTW, is there a reason that pg_restore

Re: [PATCHES] pg_restore -F bug

2005-04-29 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch fixes a bug in the error message emitted by pg_restore on an incorrect -F argument: write_msg() expects its first parameter to be a module name, not the format string. Patch applied to HEAD. Is this worth backporting? Certainly ---