Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:09:15PM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we distinguish mingw case from others so that we could ifdef out
the extra fflush()?
The buffered stderr might be a bug of mingw
After a little
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we distinguish mingw case from others so that we could ifdef out
the extra fflush()?
Isn't the right fix a single-spot patch to force stderr into unbuffered
mode? It's supposed to be that way already per spec. I could see a
one-or-two-line patch to
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:09:15PM +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we distinguish mingw case from others so that we could ifdef out
the extra fflush()?
The buffered stderr might be a bug of mingw
After a little research, I found that MSDN
Can we distinguish mingw case from others so that we could ifdef out
the extra fflush()?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
pgbench reports its progress of loading (N tuples done.) or vacuuming
(vacuum...end), but the messages are not printed on the moment on mingw.
The reason seems to be the
