Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2005-06-04 17:27:10 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > OK, would you please submit a patch to fix it. Thanks.
> >
> > I will unless someone beats me to it in
At 2005-06-04 17:27:10 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > OK, would you please submit a patch to fix it. Thanks.
>
> I will unless someone beats me to it in the next 2 weeks
Here's a patch to do the following:
1. Rename spi_return_next to return_next.
2. Add a new test for return_next.
3. Upda
Bruce Momjian said:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> This has broken the regression tests for plperl - see for example
>>
>>
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=panda&dt=2005-06-04%2021:20:01>>
That's because, as Abhijit noted in point 4 below, select foo_srf() no
>> longer works.
>>
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> This has broken the regression tests for plperl - see for example
>
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=panda&dt=2005-06-04%2021:20:01
> That's because, as Abhijit noted in point 4 below, select foo_srf() no
> longer works.
>
> At a minimum those call
This has broken the regression tests for plperl - see for example
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=panda&dt=2005-06-04%2021:20:01
That's because, as Abhijit noted in point 4 below, select foo_srf() no
longer works.
At a minimum those calls need to be removed from the regression
Mega-patch version applied. Thanks.
---
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2005-05-21 20:18:50 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > The second issue is where plperl returns a large result set.
>
> I have attached the foll
Neil Conway said:
> On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:25 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>> I have attached the following seven patches to address this problem:
>
> Does anyone with the skills to review this (i.e. someone other than me)
> have any comments on this patch?
>
> Otherwise I'll apply it in a day
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:25 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> I have attached the following seven patches to address this problem:
Does anyone with the skills to review this (i.e. someone other than me)
have any comments on this patch?
Otherwise I'll apply it in a day or two.
-Neil
--
