On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 18:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> the default behavior is still the same
Just had time to check this. You're right, my mistake.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---(end of broadcast)--
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:42 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >
> >This is the most recent email I have on this. Was the scrollable patch
> >applied? If not, would you resubmit?
> >
>
> I resubmit scrollable cursor patch
I notice your patch has been accepted, though admit I hadn't noticed it
prev
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 18:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There is no change in the default behavior.
> Previously:
> - PL/pgSQL cursors were non-scrollable
> - DECLARE CURSOR cursors were not non-scrollable by default
No, they weren't "non-scrollable", the
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 18:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm concerned that many PL/pgSQL routines will now run slower because
> > they may now be considered scrollable when they previously were not.
>
> There is no change in the default behavior.
Previou
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm concerned that many PL/pgSQL routines will now run slower because
> they may now be considered scrollable when they previously were not.
There is no change in the default behavior.
regards, tom lane
-
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 17:42 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >
> >This is the most recent email I have on this. Was the scrollable patch
> >applied? If not, would you resubmit?
> >
>
> I resubmit scrollable cursor patch
I notice your patch has been accepted, though admit I hadn't noticed it
previo
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Pa
