Patch applied by Neil.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeremy Drake wrote:
> I sent this in rather late in the 8.2 cycle, so now that 8.3 development
> is underway I thought I'd try sending it again.  This patch was necessary
> in the development of a large object regression test, but is logically
> seperate and reasonable even without that test, so I'm sending it in
> seperately for independant consideration.  I'll save my pushing on the
> large object test until this one gets in ;)
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
> Subject: [PATCHES] psql \lo_* quiet mode patch
> 
> I sent this in a while back, but never heard anything about it.
> 
> This patch makes psql's \lo_* commands respect the -q flag (or other
> methods of setting quiet mode) as well as HTML output mode.  This came in
> very handy when writing a regression test which uses the \lo_import
> command since it would otherwise output the OID of the new large object
> which would be different every run.
> 
> Please let me know if it is ok, or if I need to do it differently.
> 
> -- 
> Let me assure you that to us here at First National, you're not just a
> number.  You're two numbers, a dash, three more numbers, another dash
> and another number.
>               -- James Estes
Content-Description: 

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to