As Greg suggested, update you all that each vm has its own dedicated esx.
Every esx has it`s own local disks.
I run it one time on two different servers that has the same hardware and
same postgresql db (version and conf). The results :
pgbench -i -s 6  pgbench -p 5432 -U postgres
 pgbench -c 16 -j 4 -T 5 -U postgres pgbench
MACHINE 1
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: <builtin: TPC-B (sort of)>
scaling factor: 6
query mode: simple
number of clients: 16
number of threads: 4
duration: 5 s
number of transactions actually processed: 669
latency average = 122.633 ms
tps = 130.470828 (including connections establishing)
tps = 130.620286 (excluding connections establishing)

MACHINE 2

pgbench -c 16 -j 4 -T 600 -U postgres -p 5433 pgbench
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: <builtin: TPC-B (sort of)>
scaling factor: 6
query mode: simple
number of clients: 16
number of threads: 4
duration: 600 s
number of transactions actually processed: 2393723
latency average = 4.011 ms
tps = 3989.437514 (including connections establishing)
tps = 3989.473036 (excluding connections establishing)

any idea what can cause such a difference ? Both of the machines have
20core and 65GB of ram.

‫בתאריך יום ה׳, 13 בדצמ׳ 2018 ב-15:54 מאת ‪Mariel Cherkassky‬‏ <‪
mariel.cherkas...@gmail.com‬‏>:‬

> Ok, I'll do that.  Thanks .
>
> ‫בתאריך יום ה׳, 13 בדצמ׳ 2018 ב-15:54 מאת ‪Greg Clough‬‏ <‪
> greg.clo...@ihsmarkit.com‬‏>:‬
>
>> Hmmm... sounds like you’ve got most of it covered.  It may be a good idea
>> to send that last message back to the list, as maybe others will have
>> better ideas.
>>
>>
>>
>> Greg.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Mariel Cherkassky <mariel.cherkas...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 13, 2018 1:45 PM
>> *To:* Greg Clough <greg.clo...@ihsmarkit.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: pgbench results arent accurate
>>
>>
>>
>> Both of the machines are the only vms in a dedicated esx for each one.
>> Each esx has local disks.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018, 3:05 PM Greg Clough <greg.clo...@ihsmarkit.com
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I installed a new postgres 9.6 on both of my machines.
>>
>>
>>
>> Where is your storage?  Is it local, or on a SAN?  A SAN will definitely
>> have a cache, so possibly there is another layer of cache that you’re not
>> accounting for.
>>
>>
>>
>> Greg Clough.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> This e-mail, including accompanying communications and attachments, is
>> strictly confidential and only for the intended recipient. Any retention,
>> use or disclosure not expressly authorised by IHSMarkit is prohibited. This
>> email is subject to all waivers and other terms at the following link:
>> https://ihsmarkit.com/Legal/EmailDisclaimer.html
>>
>> Please visit www.ihsmarkit.com/about/contact-us.html for contact
>> information on our offices worldwide.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> This e-mail, including accompanying communications and attachments, is
>> strictly confidential and only for the intended recipient. Any retention,
>> use or disclosure not expressly authorised by IHSMarkit is prohibited. This
>> email is subject to all waivers and other terms at the following link:
>> https://ihsmarkit.com/Legal/EmailDisclaimer.html
>>
>> Please visit www.ihsmarkit.com/about/contact-us.html for contact
>> information on our offices worldwide.
>>
>

Reply via email to