On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 23:41, MichaelDBA wrote:
> The article referenced below assumes a worst case scenario for bulk-loading
> with hash partitioned tables. It assumes that the values being inserted are
> in strict ascending or descending order with no gaps (like a sequence number
> incrementi
The article referenced below assumes a worst case scenario for
bulk-loading with hash partitioned tables. It assumes that the values
being inserted are in strict ascending or descending order with no gaps
(like a sequence number incrementing by 1), thereby ensuring every
partition is hit in or
