Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark

2024-11-11 Thread Ba Jinsheng
>> The default configurations of PostgreSQL incur the error: "ERROR: could not >> resize shared memory segment "/PostgreSQL.3539600020" to 2097152 bytes: No >> space left on device" >No comment on your optimiser experiments for now, but for this error: >it reminds me of a low/default --shm-siz

Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark

2024-11-11 Thread Ba Jinsheng
>It is all the time a challenge for PostgreSQL to estimate such a filter >because of absent information on joint column distribution. >Can you research this way by building extended statistics on these >clauses? It could move the plan to the more optimal direction. Thanks a lot for your effort to

Re: Performance of Query 4 on TPC-DS Benchmark

2024-11-11 Thread Andrei Lepikhov
On 11/11/24 02:35, Ba Jinsheng wrote: Hi all, Please see this case: Query 4 on TPC-DS benchmark: Thank you for interesting example! Looking into explains I see two sortings: -> Sort (cost=794037.94..794037.95 rows=1 width=132) (actual time=3024403.310..3024403.313 rows=8 loops=1) -> Sor