On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:07 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Maxim Boguk writes:
> > Reading the code - probably the lowest hanging fruit is to make
> > 'The current multiplier of 1000 * cpu_operator_cost' configurable in the
> > future versions.
Is the 100x backend memory usage per cached plan differenc
On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 03:19, Maxim Boguk wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 6:01 PM David Rowley wrote:
>> This is just an artifact of the fact that runtime pruning is not factored
>> into the costs. Note the cost of the generic plan. The plan_cache_mode GUC
>> is about the only way to overrule
