On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 9:48 AM Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>
> Stephen Frost schrieb am 20.11.2018 um 18:28:
> > Oh yes, having a dictionary would be a great start to reducing the size
> > of the jsonb data, though it could then become a contention point if
> > there's a lot of new values being
Stephen Frost schrieb am 20.11.2018 um 18:28:
> Oh yes, having a dictionary would be a great start to reducing the size
> of the jsonb data, though it could then become a contention point if
> there's a lot of new values being inserted and such. Naturally there
> would also be a cost to pulling
Greetings,
* Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:28 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Oh yes, having a dictionary would be a great start to reducing the size
> > of the jsonb data, though it could then become a contention point if
> > there's a lot of new values
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:28 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> * Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:43 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > * Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:26 AM Stephen Frost
> > > >
Greetings,
* Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:43 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:26 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > > Looks like a lot of the difference being seen and the comments
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:43 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> * Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:26 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Looks like a lot of the difference being seen and the comments made
> > > about one being faster than the other
Greetings,
* Merlin Moncure (mmonc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:26 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Looks like a lot of the difference being seen and the comments made
> > about one being faster than the other are because one system is
> > compressing *everything*, while PG
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:26 AM Stephen Frost wrote:
> Looks like a lot of the difference being seen and the comments made
> about one being faster than the other are because one system is
> compressing *everything*, while PG (quite intentionally...) only
> compresses the data sometimes- once it
Hi again,
On 11/20/18 2:34 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> I agree with you the compression is playing a role in the comparison.
>> Probably there is a toll to pay when the load is high and the CPU
>> stressed from de/compressing data. If we will be able to bring our
>> studies that further, this is
Greetings,
* Fabio Pardi (f.pa...@portavita.eu) wrote:
> thanks for your feedback.
We prefer on these mailing lists to not top-post but instead to reply
inline, as I'm doing here. This helps the conversation by eliminating
unnecessary dialogue and being able to make comments regarding specific
Hi Stephen,
thanks for your feedback.
I agree with you the compression is playing a role in the comparison.
Probably there is a toll to pay when the load is high and the CPU
stressed from de/compressing data. If we will be able to bring our
studies that further, this is definitely something we
Greetings,
* Fabio Pardi (f.pa...@portavita.eu) wrote:
> We are open to any kind of feedback and we hope you enjoy the reading.
Looks like a lot of the difference being seen and the comments made
about one being faster than the other are because one system is
compressing *everything*, while PG
12 matches
Mail list logo
