Hi I just checked the dmesg.
The segfault I wrote about is the only one I see, dated Nov 24 last year.
Since then no other segfaults happened although dsa_allocated failures
happen daily.
I'll report if anything occurs.
I have the core dumping setup in place.
--
regards,
pozdrawiam,
Jakub Glapa
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:52:07AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Hi, thanks for following through.
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:38:35PM +0100, Jakub Glapa wrote:
> > I had a look at dmesg and indeed I see something like:
> >
> > postgres[30667]: segfault at 0 ip 557834264b16 sp
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:31:47PM +, Arne Roland wrote:
> I could take a backup and restore the relevant tables on a throwaway system.
> You are just suggesting to replace line 728
> elog(FATAL,
> "dsa_allocate could not find %zu free
> pages", npages);
> by
It's definitely a quite a relatively complex pattern. The query I set you last
time was minimal with respect to predicates (so removing any single one of the
predicates converted that one into a working query).
> Huh. Ok well that's a lot more frequent that I thought. Is it always the
> same
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:52 PM Jakub Glapa wrote:
> I see the error showing up every night on 2 different servers. But it's a bit
> of a heisenbug because If I go there now it won't be reproducible.
Huh. Ok well that's a lot more frequent that I thought. Is it always
the same query? Any
Hi Thomas,
I was one of the reporter in the early Dec last year.
I somehow dropped the ball and forgot about the issue.
Anyhow I upgraded the clusters to pg11.1 and nothing changed. I also have a
rule to coredump but a segfault does not happen while this is occurring.
I see the error showing up
Hi Thomas,
it is a Production system and we don’t have permanent access to it.
Also to have an auto_explain feature always on, is not an option in production.
I will ask the customer to give us notice asap the error present itself to
connect immediately and try to get a query plan.
Regards
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:32 PM Fabio Isabettini
wrote:
> we are facing a similar issue on a Production system using a Postgresql 10.6:
>
> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: EXCEPTION on getstatistics ; ID:
> EXCEPTION on getstatistics_media ; ID: uidatareader.
> run_query_media(2):
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:50 AM Arne Roland wrote:
> does anybody have any idea what goes wrong here? Is there some additional
> information that could be helpful?
Hi Arne,
This seems to be a bug; that error should not be reached. I wonder if
it is a different manifestation of the bug
Hello,
does anybody have any idea what goes wrong here? Is there some additional
information that could be helpful?
All the best
Arne Roland
Justin thanks for the information!
I'm running Ubuntu 16.04.
I'll try to prepare for the next crash.
Couldn't find anything this time.
--
regards,
Jakub Glapa
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:52 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Hi, thanks for following through.
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:38:35PM
Hi, thanks for following through.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:38:35PM +0100, Jakub Glapa wrote:
> I had a look at dmesg and indeed I see something like:
>
> postgres[30667]: segfault at 0 ip 557834264b16 sp 7ffc2ce1e030
> error 4 in postgres[557833db7000+6d5000]
That's useful, I think
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 03:31:41PM +0100, Jakub Glapa wrote:
> Hi Justin, I've upgrade to 10.6 but the error still shows up:
>
> If I set it to max_parallel_workers=0 I also get and my connection is being
> closed (but the server is alive):
>
> psql db@host as user => set max_parallel_workers=0;
Hi Justin, I've upgrade to 10.6 but the error still shows up:
psql db@host as user => select version();
version
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:26:42PM +0100, Jakub Glapa wrote:
> Looks like my email didn't match the right thread:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMAYy4%2Bw3NTBM5JLWFi8twhWK4%3Dk_5L4nV5%2BbYDSPu8r4b97Zg%40mail.gmail.com
> Any chance to get some feedback on this?
In the related
Hi, I'm also experiencing the problem: dsa_allocate could not find 7 free
pages CONTEXT: parallel worker
I'm running: PostgreSQL 10.5 (Ubuntu 10.5-1.pgdg16.04+1) on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.10) 5.4.0
20160609, 64-bit
query plan: (select statement over
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:48 PM Sand Stone wrote:
> I attached a query (and its query plan) that caused the crash: "dsa_allocate
> could not find 13 free pages" on one of the worker nodes. I anonymised the
> query text a bit. Interestingly, this time only one (same one) of the nodes
> is
I attached a query (and its query plan) that caused the crash:
"dsa_allocate could not find 13 free pages" on one of the worker nodes. I
anonymised the query text a bit. Interestingly, this time only one (same
one) of the nodes is crashing. Since this is a production environment, I
cannot get the
Just as a follow up. I tried the parallel execution again (in a stress
test environment). Now the crash seems gone. I will keep an eye on
this for the next few weeks.
My theory is that the Citus cluster created and shut down a lot of TCP
connections between coordinator and workers. If running on
>>dsa_allocate could not find 7 free pages
I just this error message again on all of my worker nodes (I am using
Citus 7.4 rel). The PG core is my own build of release_10_stable
(10.4) out of GitHub on Ubuntu.
What's the best way to debug this? I am running pre-production tests
for the next few
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rick Otten writes:
>> I'm wondering if there is anything I can tune in my PG 10.1 database to
>> avoid these errors:
>
>> $ psql -f failing_query.sql
>> psql:failing_query.sql:46: ERROR:
Rick Otten writes:
> I'm wondering if there is anything I can tune in my PG 10.1 database to
> avoid these errors:
> $ psql -f failing_query.sql
> psql:failing_query.sql:46: ERROR: dsa_allocate could not find 7 free pages
> CONTEXT: parallel worker
Hmm. There's
22 matches
Mail list logo