On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:42 PM Merlin Moncure wrote:
> See thread, https://postgrespro.com/list/thread-id/2069516
>
> The setting only impacts certain scan operations, it's not a gamechanger.
Useful, thanks.
Luca
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 2:55 PM Luca Ferrari wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:52 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:45:15PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > I'm unable to find (apparently) a way to find out a possible value to
> > > start with for effecti
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 03:27:39PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:22:59PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:15 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > Note that the interpretation of this GUC changed in v13.
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/release-1
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:22:59PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:15 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Note that the interpretation of this GUC changed in v13.
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/release-13.html
> > |Change the way non-default effective_io_concurrency values
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:15 PM Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Note that the interpretation of this GUC changed in v13.
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/release-13.html
> |Change the way non-default effective_io_concurrency values affect
> concurrency (Thomas Munro)
> |Previously, this value was adj
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 03:52:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:45:15PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm unable to find (apparently) a way to find out a possible value to
> > start with for effective_io_concurrency.
> > I suspect that benchmarking, e.g., us
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:54:56PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:52 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:45:15PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > I'm unable to find (apparently) a way to find out a possible value to
> > > start with for
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:52 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:45:15PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm unable to find (apparently) a way to find out a possible value to
> > start with for effective_io_concurrency.
> > I suspect that benchmarking, e.g., using bon
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:45:15PM +0200, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm unable to find (apparently) a way to find out a possible value to
> start with for effective_io_concurrency.
> I suspect that benchmarking, e.g., using bonnie++ or sysbench and
> testing with different values of concurren
Hi all,
I'm unable to find (apparently) a way to find out a possible value to
start with for effective_io_concurrency.
I suspect that benchmarking, e.g., using bonnie++ or sysbench and
testing with different values of concurrency could help to determine
the max number of concurrent request, (tps, l
10 matches
Mail list logo