On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 09:19:05AM -0500, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2017, at 12:38 AM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > BTW depending on your requirements, it may be possible to make pg_dump much
> > more efficient. For our data, it's reasonable to assume that a table is
> > "final" if its cons
On Dec 30, 2017, at 12:38 AM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> For inheritance (available in and before PG10), the parent may be nonempty,
> which works fine, although someone else might find it unintuitive. (Does the
> doc actually say "should" somewhere ?)
Well it doesn’t say should, but says “normally”
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:37:56PM -0500, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> The docs claim that the master table “should” be empty. It it possible to
> just create child tables off an existing master table with data, then just
> inserting data into the new child tables.
>
> THe plan would be to keep data
The docs claim that the master table “should” be empty. It it possible to just
create child tables off an existing master table with data, then just inserting
data into the new child tables.
THe plan would be to keep data in the master table and purge it over time until
it’s eventually empty, t
