Hello Tomas,
The auto explain analyze caught this:
2021-09-14 06:55:33 UTC, pid=12345 db=mydb, usr=myuser, client=ip,
app=PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, line=55 LOG: duration: 5934.165 ms plan:
Query Text: SELECT * FROM myschema.mytable pbh WHERE
pbh.product_code = $1 AND pbh.cage_player_id = $
Hi Jeff,
The specialized index is present due to some other queries and the
index is used frequently (according to the statistics). I do agree
that in this particular case the index btree (cage_code,
cage_player_id, product_code, balance_type, modified_time) would solve
the problem but at the mome
On Tue, 2021-09-14 at 10:55 +0300, Kristjan Mustkivi wrote:
> 2021-09-14 06:55:33 UTC, pid=12345 db=mydb, usr=myuser, client=ip,
> app=PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, line=55 LOG: duration: 5934.165 ms plan:
> Query Text: SELECT * FROM myschema.mytable pbh WHERE
> pbh.product_code = $1 AND pbh.cag
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 3:55 AM Kristjan Mustkivi
wrote:
> Hello Tomas,
>
> The auto explain analyze caught this:
>
> 2021-09-14 06:55:33 UTC, pid=12345 db=mydb, usr=myuser, client=ip,
> app=PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, line=55 LOG: duration: 5934.165 ms plan:
> Query Text: SELECT * FROM mysche
I am very sorry, I indeed copy-pasted an incomplete plan. Here it is in full:
2021-09-14 06:55:33 UTC, pid=27576 db=mydb, usr=myuser, client=ip,
app=PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, line=55 LOG: duration: 5934.165 ms plan:
Query Text: SELECT * FROM myschema.mytable pbh WHERE
pbh.product_code =
Kristjan Mustkivi writes:
> -> Index Scan Backward using player_balance_history_idx2 on
> mytable pbh (cost=0.70..21639.94 rows=3885 width=66) (actual
> time=5934.153..5934.153 rows=1 loops=1)
> Index Cond: ((cage_code = $3) AND (cage_player_id =
> $2) AND (modified_tim
EnterpriseDB is basically postgres with the added oracle compatability
and some added external tools. THe default user & db will no longer be
postgres but 'enterprisedb', but it is still postgresql so you won't
have any issues working with EDB if you already know postgres
On 9/13/21 20:52, M
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 5:15 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Kristjan Mustkivi writes:
> > -> Index Scan Backward using player_balance_history_idx2 on
> > mytable pbh (cost=0.70..21639.94 rows=3885 width=66) (actual
> > time=5934.153..5934.153 rows=1 loops=1)
> > Index Cond: ((
Kristjan Mustkivi writes:
>>> Filter: (((product_code)::text = ($1)::text) AND
>>> ((balance_type)::text = ($4)::text))
> But the Primary Key is defined as btree (cage_code, cage_player_id,
> product_code, balance_type, version) so this should be exactly that
> (apart from the extra "version" col
In addition to the Sbob comments, if we install the EDB with postgres
compatibility option in such a case we may continue to use postgres user as
default super user and other configuration parameters would remain the same as
community PostgreSQL.
It would work perfectly fine with pgAdmin4 and
Hello!
Both are of type varchar(30).
So is this something odd: Filter: (((product_code)::text = ($1)::text)
AND ((balance_type)::text = ($4)::text)) ?
But why does it do the type-cast if both product_code and balance_type
are of type text (although with constraint 30) and the values are also
of
11 matches
Mail list logo