On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, 23:58 Rick Otten, wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:15 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2019-08-01 23:36:33 +0530, Purav Chovatia wrote:
>> > > If you've set synchronous_commit = off, and you still get only 1200
>> > > transactions/sec, something else is off.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:15 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-08-01 23:36:33 +0530, Purav Chovatia wrote:
> > > If you've set synchronous_commit = off, and you still get only 1200
> > > transactions/sec, something else is off. Are you sure you set that?
> > I am not very surprised with
Hi,
On 2019-08-01 23:36:33 +0530, Purav Chovatia wrote:
> > If you've set synchronous_commit = off, and you still get only 1200
> > transactions/sec, something else is off. Are you sure you set that?
> I am not very surprised with these results. However, what’s the disk type?
> That can matter
Hi,
On 2019-08-01 08:40:53 +0530, Shital A wrote:
> Need help in:
> 1. On this env(8core cpu, 16GB) what is the TPS that we can expect? We have
> tested with a simple Java code firing insert and commit in a loop on a
> simple table with one column. We get 1200 rows per sec. If we increase
>
