Hello Jeff,
Thank you again for your advice.
I did indeed think of the ARRAY_AGG() version of the query.
Although this method is very fast (and does use indexes) for smallish array
sizes, this is sadly not practical in my case because the arrays of
matching rows can reach multiple hundreds of
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 3:57 AM Mickael van der Beek <
mickael.van.der.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jeff,
>
> Sadly, the query you suggested won't work because you are only returning
> the first row of the matching inner query rows.
>
Sure, but the query I replaced did the same thing. (I
Hello Jeff,
Sadly, the query you suggested won't work because you are only returning
the first row of the matching inner query rows.
Example:
SELECT
> u.idx,
> u.page_idxs
> FROM
> (
> VALUES
> (1, ARRAY[11, 21, 31]),
> (2, ARRAY[12, 21, 32]),
> (3, ARRAY[13, 23, 31])
