Em ter., 23 de mai. de 2023 às 08:43, Druckenmueller, Marc <
marc.druckenmuel...@philips.com> escreveu:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> I am investigating possible throughput with PostgreSQL 14.4 on an ARM
> i.MX6 Quad CPU (NXP sabre board).
>
> Testing with a simple python script (running on the same CPU),
On 2023-05-23 12:42, Druckenmueller, Marc wrote:
Hi there,
I am investigating possible throughput with PostgreSQL 14.4 on an ARM
i.MX6 Quad CPU (NXP sabre board).
Testing with a simple python script (running on the same CPU), I get
~1000 request/s.
I tweaked your script slightly, but this is
"Druckenmueller, Marc" writes:
> I am investigating possible throughput with PostgreSQL 14.4 on an ARM i.MX6
> Quad CPU (NXP sabre board).
> Testing with a simple python script (running on the same CPU), I get ~1000
> request/s.
That does seem pretty awful for modern hardware, but it's hard to
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 13:43, Druckenmueller, Marc
wrote:
> Testing with a simple python script (running on the same CPU), I get ~1000
> request/s.
Is the time spent in the client or in the server? Are there noticeable
differences if you execute that statement in a loop in psql (with the
Hi there,
I am investigating possible throughput with PostgreSQL 14.4 on an ARM i.MX6
Quad CPU (NXP sabre board).
Testing with a simple python script (running on the same CPU), I get ~1000
request/s.
import psycopg as pg
conn = pg.connect('dbname=test')
conn.autocommit = True
cur =
