On 2018-08-17 15:21:19 +0200, Alexis Lê-Quôc wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:50 PM Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2018-08-14 10:46:45 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2018-08-14 15:18:55 +0200, Alexis Lê-Quôc wrote:
> > > > + 30.25%26.78% postgres postgres [.]
Hi,
On 2018-08-14 15:18:55 +0200, Alexis Lê-Quôc wrote:
> We run
> a cluster of
> large, SSD-backed, i3.16xl (64 cores visible to Linux, ~500GB of RAM, with
> 8GB of shared_buffers, fast NVMe drives) nodes
> , each
> running PG 9.3
> on linux
> in a vanilla streaming asynchronous replication
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Alexis Lê-Quôc wrote:
>
each
running PG 9.3
on linux
That is the oldest version which is still supported. There have been a lot
of improvements since then, including to performance. You should see if an
upgrade solves the problem. If not, at least you will
Hi,
I have been puzzled by very different replication performance (meaning
50-100x slower) between identical replicas (both in “hardware” and
configuration) once the amount of data to replicate increases. I’ve gone
down a number of dead ends and am missing something
(
likely obvious
)
that I hope
