Since there seem to be a lot of different opinions regarding the various
different RAID configurations I thought I'd post this link to the list:
http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/ref/hdd/perf/raid/index.html
This is the best resource for information on RAID and hard drive
performance I found
"Arjen van der Meijden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, reboting is not a problem with ext2, but crashing might be... And
> normally you don't plan a systemcrash ;)
> Ext3 and xfs handle that much better.
A journaling filesystem is good to use if you can set it to journal
metadata but not file
> Andrew McMillan wrote:
>
> The general heuristic is that RAID-5 is not the way to deal
> with databases. Now surely someone will disagree with me,
> but as I understand it RAID-5 has a bottleneck on a single
> disk for the
> (checksum) information. Bottleneck is not the word you want
> to h
SUBSCRIBE
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 00:53, Alexander Priem wrote:
> Wow, I never figured how many different RAID configurations one could think
> of :)
>
> After reading lots of material, forums and of course, this mailing-list, I
> think I am going for a RAID5 configuration of 6 disks (18Gb, 15.000 rpm
> eac
