On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The "right answer" for most use seems likely to involve:
> > a) Getting an appropriate number of bins (I suspect 10 is a bit
> > small, but I can't justify that mathematically), and
>
> I suspect that a
In the performance case the machine was running RedHat AS 2.1. I have posted the
database schema at (obtained from pg_dump -s):
http://serverbeach.plexq.com/~aturner/schema.sql
The time to run all the stats procedures dropped through the floor.
refresh_hourly_iud, adl_hourly_iud, rebuild_dail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("scott.marlowe") writes:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > The "right answer" for most use seems likely to involve:
>> > a) Getting an appropriate number of bins (I suspect 10 is a bit
>> > small, but I can't just
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The Vacuum full is performed once at the end of the whole job.
>
have you also tried vacuum analyze periodically - it does not lock the
table and can help quite a bit?
still odd why it would be that much slower between those versions.
--
Jeff Tro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As for 7.3.3, the project in question suffered a 10x performance
> degredation on 7.3.3 which went away when we rolled back to 7.3.2.
I would like to pursue that report and find out why. I've just gone
through the CVS logs between 7.3.2 and 7.3.3, and I don't see any c
Thanks for the URL, I went through postgresql.conf and made some modifications to the
config based on information therein. I will have to wait and see how it affects
things, as I won't know for a week or so.
Select time has never been a problem, the DB has always been very fast, it's the
inser
> You want values *much* higher than that. How much RAM do you have? See:
> http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html
> http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/annotated_conf_e.html
Now THAT is a remarkable document! I vote for putting that information into
the Po
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The "right answer" for most use seems likely to involve:
> a) Getting an appropriate number of bins (I suspect 10 is a bit
> small, but I can't justify that mathematically), and
I suspect that also, but I don't have real evidence for it either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Mary Edie Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Stephan Szabo kindly responded to our earlier queries suggesting
>> > we look at default_statistics_target and ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN
>> > SET STATISTICS.
>>
>> > These determine th
