I'v spent a couple days playing with this problem and searching the mailing lists and
docs etc but come up with nothing. Any help would be much appreciated.
Setup is postgres 7.3.2 on redhat 7.1 on a 1.3GHz Athlon machine with 1G pc133 ram and
SCSI.
Here is the same query with the addition of a l
Any thoughts?
Actually, I ran my tests using tsearch V1. I wonder if there has been
some weird regression between tsearch 1 and 2?
I also ran my tests on 7.3.4 :(
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:12:30PM -0800, Steve Atkins wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:41:59PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > >Does anyone have any metrics on how fast tsearch2 actually is?
> > >
> > >I tried it on a synthetic dataset of a million documents of a hundred
> > >words ea
Any thoughts?
Actually, I ran my tests using tsearch V1. I wonder if there has been
some weird regression between tsearch 1 and 2?
hris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
I did not conduct much more test but from what I've seen, it looks like the
ODBC driver is in the doldrums, not PG. For example, when I run my software
on Windows rather than Linux, everything just works as expected. Sorry for
disturbing.
And btw, I use ODBC because my target DB is Oracle and I
Hi,
I have done some performance tests on 1Gb and 4 Gb Databases on a mono
Pentium 4 , 1 Gb RAM, IDE disk, SCSI disks and RAID0 LUN on DAS 5300 on
Linux RedHat 7.3.
In each cases my tests make select, update and insert.
One of them is pgbench. You can find it in Postgres/contrib/pgbench.
The othe