(Pardon my replying two two replies at once, I only get the digest and
this was easier).
Michael Stone wrote:
[...]
Well, that's what you'd expect. But a first time 70MB fetch on a freshly
rebooted system took just as long as all secondary times. (Took over a minute
to fetch, which is too l
On Aug 11, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
Like Mr. Stone said earlier, this is pure dogma. In my experience,
xlogs on the same volume with data is much faster if both are on
battery-backed write-back RAID controller memory. Moving from this
situation to xlogs on a single normal di
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, that's what you'd expect. But a first time 70MB fetch on a freshly
> > rebooted system took just as long as all secondary times. (Took over a
> > minute to fetch, which is too long for my needs, at least on secondary
> > attempts).
That's not
