[very, very offtopic]
Ok. This comparition is just as useless as the other one,
because it's comparing oranges with apples (It's funny
anyway). I was just choosing an example in which you can see
the best of postgresql against 'not so nice' behavior of
mssql2000 (no service pack, it's my
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:25:47AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
SQL 2005 has MVCC (they call it something different, of course, but
that's basicallyi what it is)
Interesting; do they use an overwriting storage manager like Oracle, or
a non-overwriting one like Postgres?
--
Alvaro Herrera
7.4 is the pg version BTWgoing to switch to 8 if it's worth it.
Ingrate, n.: A man who bites the hand that feeds him, and then complains
of indigestion.
--
Don't say yes until I finish talking.
-- Darryl F. Zanuck
--
Don't say yes until I finish talking.
--
Hi,
One simple question. For 125 or more checkpoint segments (checkpoint_timeout
is 600 seconds, shared_buffers are at 21760 or 170MB) on a very busy database,
what is more suitable, a separate 6 disk RAID5 volume, or a RAID10 volume?
Databases will be on separate spindles. Disks are
