This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
>
> I changed CLOG Buffers to 16
>
> Running the test again:
> # ./read.d
> dtrace: script
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Jeff Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > OK, impressive RAID-6 performance (not so impressive RAID-10
> > performance, but that could be a filesystem issue). Note to self; try
> > an Areca controller in next storage server.
>
> I believe these were both on ext3. I
On Nov 14, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Jeff Frost wrote:
I believe these were both on ext3. I thought I had some XFS results
available for comparison, but I couldn't find them.
You'd see similar with the UFS2 file system on FreeBSD.
---(end of broadcast)---
On Nov 14, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Russell Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It is possible that analyze is not getting the number of dead rows
right?
Hah, I think you are on to something. ANALYZE is telling the truth
about how many "dead" rows it saw, but its notion of "dead" is
On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Jeff Frost wrote:
On an 8xRAID10 volume with the smaller Areca controller we were
seeing around 450 seeks/sec.
On our 6 disk raid10 on a 3ware 9550sx I'm able to get about 120 seek
+ reads/sec per process, with an aggregate up to about 500 or so.
The dis
