Eduardo Piombino wrote:
Postgres version: 8.2.4, with all defaults, except DateStyle and TimeZone.
Ugh...there are several features in PostgreSQL 8.3 and later
specifically to address the sort of issue you're running into. If you
want to get good write performance out of this system, you may
Excellent, lots of useful information in your message.
I will follow your advices, and keep you posted on any progress. I have yet
to confirm you with some technical details of my setup, but I'm pretty sure
you hit the nail in any case.
One last question, this IO issue I'm facing, do you think it
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hmm. Not clear where the temp files are coming from, but it's *not* the
> sort --- the "internal sort ended" line shows that that sort never went
> to disk. What kind of plan is feeding the sort node?
>
some time ago, you said:
"""
It might b
On 13/01/2010 1:47 PM, Eduardo Piombino wrote:
I'm sorry.
The server is a production server HP Proliant, I don't remember the
exact model, but the key features were:
4 cores, over 2GHz each (I'm sorry I don't remember the actual specs), I
think it had 16G of RAM (if that is possible?)
It has two
I'm sorry.
The server is a production server HP Proliant, I don't remember the exact
model, but the key features were:
4 cores, over 2GHz each (I'm sorry I don't remember the actual specs), I
think it had 16G of RAM (if that is possible?)
It has two 320G disks in RAID (mirrored).
I don't even hav
On 13/01/2010 12:59 PM, Eduardo Piombino wrote:
My question then is: is there a way to limit the CPU assigned to a
specific connection?
I mean, I don't care if my ALTER TABLE takes 4 days instead of 4 hours.
Something like:
pg_set_max_cpu_usage(2/100);
You're assuming the issue is CPU. I thin
Eduardo Piombino wrote:
Hi list, I'm having a problem when dealing with operations that asks too
much CPU from the server.
The scenario is this:
A nice description below, but ... you give no information about your system:
number of CPUs, disk types and configuration, how much memory, what hav
On 13/01/2010 2:01 AM, Bob Dusek wrote:
The connections to postgres are happening on the localhost. Our
application server accepts connections from the network, and the
application queries Postgres using a standard pg_pconnect on the localhost.
Well, that's a good reason to have all those CPU
Hi list, I'm having a problem when dealing with operations that asks too
much CPU from the server.
The scenario is this:
I have a multithreaded server, each thread with its own connection to the
database. Everything is working fine, actually great, actually
outstandingly, in normal operation.
I'v
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Bob Dusek wrote:
Each of the concurrent clients does a series of selects, inserts, updates,
and deletes. The requests would generally never update or delete the same
rows in a table. However, the requests do generally write to the same
tables. And, they are all reading fro
> Bob, you might want to just send plain text, to avoid such problems.
Will do. Looks like gmail's interface does it nicely.
>
> -Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-p
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Bob Dusek wrote:
>
>> How do I learn more about the actual lock contention in my db? Lock
>> contention makes
>> some sense. Each of the 256 requests are relatively similar. So, I don't
>> doubt that
>> lock conte
Matthew Wakeling wrote:
>> -Kevin
>
> It'd really help us reading your emails if you could make sure
> that it is easy to distinguish your words from words you are
> quoting. It can be very confusing reading some of your emails,
> trying to remember which bits I have seen before written b
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Bob Dusek wrote:
How do I learn more about the actual lock contention in my db? Lock
contention makes
some sense. Each of the 256 requests are relatively similar. So, I don't
doubt that
lock contention could be an issue. I just don't know how to observe it or
correct
14 matches
Mail list logo