On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:18:41AM -0800, Craig James wrote:
- On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ben Chobot wrote:
-
- > On Nov 26, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Craig James wrote:
- >
- > So far I'm impressed by what I've read about Amazon's Postgres instances.
- > Maybe the reality will be disappointing, b
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ben Chobot wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Craig James wrote:
>
> So far I'm impressed by what I've read about Amazon's Postgres instances.
> Maybe the reality will be disappointing, but (for example) the idea of
> setting up streaming replication with one
On Nov 26, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Craig James wrote:
> So far I'm impressed by what I've read about Amazon's Postgres instances.
> Maybe the reality will be disappointing, but (for example) the idea of
> setting up streaming replication with one click is pretty appealing.
Where did you hear this was
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 12:01 PM, Lee Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Having attended a few PGCons, I've always heard the remark from a few
>> presenters and attendees that Postgres shouldn't be run inside a VM. That
>> bare metal is the only way to go.
>
>
On 11/25/2013 12:01 PM, Lee Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Having attended a few PGCons, I've always heard the remark from a few
> presenters and attendees that Postgres shouldn't be run inside a VM. That
> bare metal is the only way to go.
This is pretty dated advice. Early VMs had horrible performanc
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:29 AM, David Boreham wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 7:26 AM, Craig James wrote:
>
>>
>> For those of us with small (a few to a dozen servers), we'd like to get
>> out of server maintenance completely. Can anyone with experience on a cloud
>> VM solution comment? ...
>>
>
> I've
On 11/26/2013 7:26 AM, Craig James wrote:
For those of us with small (a few to a dozen servers), we'd like to
get out of server maintenance completely. Can anyone with experience
on a cloud VM solution comment? Do the VM solutions provided by the
major hosting companies have the same good pe
On 11/26/2013 08:51 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-11-25 21:19 keltezéssel, Heikki Linnakangas írta:
On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
Having attended a few PGCons, I've always heard the remark from a few
presenters and attendees that Postgres shouldn't be run inside a VM.
That
On 11/26/2013 09:26 AM, Craig James wrote:
On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote:
Why shouldn't we run Postgres in a VM? What are the
downsides? Does anyone
have any metrics or benchmarks with the latest Postgres?
For those of us with small (a fe
>
> On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why shouldn't we run Postgres in a VM? What are the downsides? Does
>>> anyone
>>> have any metrics or benchmarks with the latest Postgres?
>>>
>>
For those of us with small (a few to a dozen servers), we'd like to get out
of server maintenance
Zoltan,
* Boszormenyi Zoltan (z...@cybertec.at) wrote:
> When the virtual disk is a disk file on the host machine, we've measured
> 20% or lower. The host used Fedora 19/x86_64 with IIRC a 3.10.x Linux kernel
> with EXT4 filesystem (this latter is sure, not IIRC). The effect was observed
> both un
2013-11-25 21:19 keltezéssel, Heikki Linnakangas írta:
On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
Having attended a few PGCons, I've always heard the remark from a few
presenters and attendees that Postgres shouldn't be run inside a VM. That
bare metal is the only way to go.
Here at work we we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2013 09:01 PM, Lee Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Having attended a few PGCons, I've always heard the remark from a
> few presenters and attendees that Postgres shouldn't be run inside
> a VM. That bare metal is the only way to go.
>
[]
13 matches
Mail list logo
