Re: [PERFORM] hyperthreadin low performance

2015-07-24 Thread Mark Kirkwood
On 23/07/15 23:37, domenico febbo wrote: is the problem also in PostgreSQL 9.4.x? I'm going to buy a production's server with 4 sockets E7-4850 12 cores so 12*4 = 48 cores (and 96 threads using HT). What do you suggest? Using or not HT? From my experience 9.4 is considerably better (we are us

Re: [PERFORM] bitmap heap scan recheck for gin/fts with no lossy blocks

2015-07-24 Thread Jeff Janes
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Laurent Debacker wrote: The Recheck Cond line is a plan-time piece of info, not a run-time piece. > It only tells you what condition is going to be rechecked if a recheck is > found to be necessary. Thanks Jeff! That makes sense indeed. > > I'm a bit surprised

Re: [PERFORM] bitmap heap scan recheck for gin/fts with no lossy blocks

2015-07-24 Thread Laurent Debacker
Thanks Jeff! That makes sense indeed. I'm a bit surprised a COUNT(1) would need a bitmap heap scan since we know the row count from the index, but okay. Have a nice day, Laurent On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Laurent Debacker > wrote: >