In line Jim
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 3/24/16 12:43 PM, Tory M Blue wrote:
>>
>> Slon is also starting to not be viable as it takes some indexes over 7
>> hours to complete. So this upgrade path seemed to really be nice.
>
>
> If you're standing up a new replica from
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Aldo Sarmiento wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm assuming this topic has probably been bludgeoned to a pulp, but my
> google-fu can't seem to find a solution.
>
> I have two relatively largish tables that I'm trying to join that result in
> a slow query.
>
> Hardware:
>
> 20
Hello,
I'm assuming this topic has probably been bludgeoned to a pulp, but my
google-fu can't seem to find a solution.
I have two relatively largish tables that I'm trying to join that result in
a slow query.
Hardware:
2014 iMac w/ SSD & i5 processor
Tables:
contacts: 1.14 million rows
permiss
