On 2008-02-05 Viviane Lestic wrote:
QUERY PLAN
-
Sort (cost=2345.54..2345.58 rows=16 width=308) (actual
time=270638.774..270643.142
On 2008-01-14 Patric wrote:
Well I've a normalized database..
For instance:
create table Y ( pk, data... );
create table Z ( pk , data...);
create table X ( char, references Y, references Z);
SELECT * from X;
Now I want to make a listing of the result set from
On 2007-11-13 Trevor Talbot wrote:
On 11/13/07, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
Sorry. Most of the lists I send to have ReplyTo set, but a few do
not. And then I forget.
If you use reply to all, it works wonderfully in both cases.
Then it upsets the people
On 2007-09-14 soni de wrote:
In Postgres 7.2.4, COPY command is working fine even if tables have 6
fields but we are copying only 5 fields from the file
But in Postgres 8.2.0, if table has 6 fields and we need to copy data
for 5 fields only, then we need to specify the column names too in
On 2007-09-05 Scott Marlowe wrote:
On 9/5/07, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-09-05 Scott Marlowe wrote:
On 9/5/07, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-09-05 Scott Marlowe wrote:
And there's the issue that with windows / NTFS that when one
On 2007-09-05 Scott Marlowe wrote:
And there's the issue that with windows / NTFS that when one process
opens a file for read, it locks it for all other users. This means
that things like virus scanners can cause odd, unpredictable failures
of your database.
Uh... what? Locking isn't done by
On 2007-09-05 Scott Marlowe wrote:
On 9/5/07, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-09-05 Scott Marlowe wrote:
And there's the issue that with windows / NTFS that when one process
opens a file for read, it locks it for all other users. This means
that things like virus
On 2007-07-25 Mario Weilguni wrote:
Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
I thought the to_char/to_date/to_timestamp functions were intented
for this purposes
No, they're intended for dealing with wacky formats that the regular
input/output routines can't understand or produce.
On 2007-07-13 smiley2211 wrote:
I am a bit confused...I have a database which was performing very
POORLY selecting from a view (posted earlier) on one server but
extremely fast on another server...
EXPLAIN ANALYZE'ing the query will show you the planner's estimates. The
query plans should give
On 2007-06-11 Christo Du Preez wrote:
I really hope someone can shed some light on my problem. I'm not sure
if this is a posgres or potgis issue.
Anyway, we have 2 development laptops and one live server, somehow I
managed to get the same query to perform very well om my laptop, but
on both
On 2007-04-04 Arnau wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Is there anything similar in PostgreSQL? The idea behind this is how
I can do in PostgreSQL to have tables where I can query on them very
often something like every few seconds and get results very fast
without overloading the postmaster.
If
11 matches
Mail list logo
