oin the time taken is reported as:
-> Hash Join (cost=533.45..4548.30 rows=14028 width=582) (actual
time=63.79..3826.16 rows=14028 loops=1)
So does this mean that at that point 3826.16 milli seconds had past and if
we take 414.43 from 3826.16 it shows that all the hash joins took about 3
, 20 January 2005 2:53 AM
To: Benjamin Wragg
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Disk configuration
The primary goal is to reduce the number of seeks a disk or array has to
perform. Serial write throughput is much higher than random write
throughput. If you are performing
Hi,
Has anyone had any
experiance with any of the Areca SATA RAID controllers? I was looking at a 3ware
one but it won't fit in the 2U case we have so the sales guy recommended
these.
Cheers,
Benjamin
Wragg
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-
, or will this create a
bottle neck? Would a multi disk array be more appropriate?
Cheers,
Benjamin
Wragg
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.0 - Release Date: 17/01/2005
s
RAID 10 and supports battery backed cache. Anyone had any experience with
this?
Any other particular controller that people recommend? From what I've been
reading RAID 10 and battery backed cache sound like things I need. :)
Thanks,
Benjamin Wragg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
