and on line_items ?
What are the stats settings for these tables ?
HTH,
Greg WIlliamson
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Joe --
From: Joe Van Dyk j...@tanga.com
To: Greg Williamson gwilliamso...@yahoo.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2013 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] slow joins?
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:54 PM
queries a second to the readonly
boxes, about the same to a beefier read / write master.
This is a slightly old pgbouncer at that ... used is a fairly basic mode.
Greg Williamson
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription
that are bigger than 1 hour
-- too many partitions doesn't help.
Greg Williamson
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Thanks for this description--we have index bloat problems on a massively active
(but small) database.This may help shed light on our problems.
Sorry for top-posting--challenged email reader.
Greg W.
From: Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com
To: Strahinja
Midge --
Sorry for top-quoting -- challenged mail.
Perhaps a difference in the stats estimates -- default_statistics_target ?
Can you show us a diff between the postgres config files for each instance ?
Maybe something there ...
Greg Williamson
From: Midge
? The row
estimates seem to be off wildly,
although that may be a symptom of something else and not related, it is worth
ruling out the easily tried.
HTH,
Greg Williamson
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
Joe wrote:
I have a very busy system that takes about 9 million inserts per day and each
record gets
updated at least once after the insert (all for the one same table), there
are other tables that
get hit but not as severely. As suspected I am having a problem with table
bloat. Any
?
Are the timing results consistent over several runs ? It is possible that
caching effects are entering into the time results.
Greg Williamson
- Original Message
From: Jesper Krogh jes...@krogh.cc
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Fri, January 1, 2010 3:48:43 AM
Subject: [PERFORM] Message
but there may be better ways of
doing that depending on what version you are using and what you maintenance
window looks like.
HTH,
Greg W.
From: Thom Brown thombr...@gmail.com
To: Richard Neill rn...@cam.ac.uk
Cc: Greg Williamson gwilliamso...@yahoo.com; pgsql
of caching of the desired rows, either by PostgreSQL or
by your operating system. The rollback wouldn't effect this -- the rows are
already in memory and not on disk waiting to be grabbed -- much faster on all
subsequent queries.
HTH,
Greg Williamson
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
Jared --
Forgive the top-posting -- a challenged reader.
I see this in the 8.4 analyze:
Merge Cond: (cli.clientid = dv118488y0.clientid)
Join Filter: ((dv118488y0.variableid = v118488y0.variableid) AND
(dv118488y0.cycleid = c1.cycleid) AND (dv118488y0.unitid =
the planner
says. Put this in a transaction and roll it back if you want to leave
the data unchanged, e.g.
BEGIN;
EXPLAIN ANALYZE DELETE FROM foo WHERE pk = 1234; -- or whatever values
you'd be using
ROLLBACK;
HTH,
Greg Williamson
Senior DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC, a DigitalGlobe company
13 matches
Mail list logo