erver? Is our configuration
flawed? Or are we already at a point where we need consider clustering
/ load balancing?
Any ideas and suggestions are welcome.
Regards,
Gregory Stewart
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensiv
/ session / query?
Gregory
-Original Message-
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:47 PM
To: Gregory Stewart
Cc: Mark Kirkwood; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core
All the machines I&#x
Jim,
Have you seen this happening only on W2k3? I am wondering if I should try
out 2000 Pro or XP Pro.
Not my first choice, but if it works...
-Original Message-
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 3:29 PM
To: Mark Kirkwood
Cc: Gregory Stewart
software I guess.
But I don't really know a whole lot about it.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 7:04 PM
To: Gregory Stewart
Cc: Theodore Loscalzo
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core
Gregory Stewart wr
Hello,
We are currently developing a web application and have the webserver and
PostgreSQL with our dev db running on a machine with these specs:
Win 2003 standard
AMD Athlon XP 3000 / 2.1 GHZ
2 Gig ram
120 gig SATA HD
PostgreSQL 8.1.0
Default pgsql configuration + shared buffers = 30,000
The p
